Screened Intimacies: Tinder additionally the Swipe Reason. Article Info

Screened Intimacies: Tinder additionally the Swipe Reason. Article Info

Post Info

Carolina Cambre, Concordia College, Sir George Williams University, 1455 De Maisonneuve Blvd. W. Montreal, Quebec H3G 1M8, Canada. E-mail: [email protected]

  • Abstract
  • Whole Book
  • References
  • Cited by
  • PDF


This particular article tries to amplify discursive constructions of personal connections through technologies with a study of the suggested and assumed intimacies associated with Tinder app. In the first 1 / 2, we ethnographically analyze the sociotechnical dynamics of how consumers navigate the application and take up or resist the topic positions promoted by graphical user interface feature of swiping. Inside last half, we provide a discussion from the effects on the swipe logic through post-structural conceptual lenses interrogating the ironic disruption of intimacy of Tinder’s screen.


In 2014, the then 2-year old Tinder got been acclaimed by moving Stone mag as having “upended the way unmarried someone connect” (Grigoriadis, 2014), inspiring copycat programs like JSwipe (a Jewish relationships software) and Kinder (for teens’ enjoy dates). Sean Rad, cofounder and CEO of Tinder, whose app manages to gamify the search for associates utilizing place, artwork, and communications, have meant it to be “a simplified dating software with a focus on graphics” (Grigoriadis, 2014). Title by itself, playing on an early on tentative title Matchbox as well as the stylized bonfire symbol that accompanies the company name, insinuates that when users are finding a match, sparks will inevitably travel and ignite the fireplaces of enthusiasm. In a literal good sense, whatever are ignited by a match can be viewed tinder, and also as as it happens, just customers’ time but also their unique pages really are the tinder to-be taken. While we will explore right here, this ignescent high quality may no much longer be limited to conditions of intimacy fully understood as nearness. Rather, tindering interaction might imply that even airiest of associations is actually combustible.

In traditional Western conceptions of intimacy, what is it that Tinder disrupts? Generally, closeness was classified as nearness, familiarity, and privacy from the Latin intimatus, intimare “make understood” or intimus “innermost” (“Intimae,” n.d.). However, we ponder whether the idea of close as a particular sort of closeness (and timeframe) might discursively modulated and disturbed through the ubiquity, immediacy, and velocity of connection offered by Tinder. Has got the character of intimacy ironically accepted volatility, ethereality, airiness, performance, and featheriness; or levitas? Is-it through this levitas that intimacy are paradoxically being conveyed?

In the 1st half this post, we discuss the restrictions and likelihood provided from the Tinder software as well as how these are typically taken up by users, within the second half we discuss the swipe reason through conceptual contacts of Massumi’s (1992) explanation of molarization and Virilio’s (1986) dromology. We determine web discourses, communications from inside the cellular relationships conditions, meeting facts, and user interfaces (UIs) to interrogate whatever you read as a screened intimacy manifested through a swipe reasoning on Tinder. For people, the phrase swipe logic represent the speed, or perhaps the improved watching performance urged of the UI of the application, and that very rate that surfaced as a prominent element of discourses examined both on the internet and off-line. Throughout, our company is conscious of just how closeness is being negotiated and expanded through on line practices; we trace emerging discursive juxtapositions between level and area, solidity and ethereality, and temporally between length and volatility, instability, and action. Soon after news theorist Erika Biddle (2013), the audience is enthusiastic about how “relational and fluctuating sphere of affinity . . . participate on an informational planes” and strive to “produce brand-new kinds of personal regulation and subjectivization” (p. 66). We, hence, take part the microsociological facet of the “swipe” gesture to cultivate tips around what we should situate as screened connections of closeness to emphasize elements of speed, ethereality, fragmentation, and volatility. We need screened to admit the mediatization and depersonalization that’s motivated as a result of the performance of profile-viewing enabled by the swipe reason thereby as a top-down discursive burden to closeness. In addition, we recognize the options of getting significant associations where affective signals behind customers’ screened intimacies can create potential for very own bottom-up gratifications.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *